Non-Alcoholic Drinks: what NZ households spend per week
Stats NZ publishes this category as Non-alcoholic beverages, within Food. It is called Non-Alcoholic Drinks here because that is what it is, but every figure on this page is the official category.
What this category covers
Drinks other than alcohol: coffee beans and instant coffee, tea, cocoa and drinking chocolate, soft drinks and energy drinks, bottled and flavoured water, cordial, and fruit and vegetable juice. Both the packet bought to make at home and the bottle bought to drink now are counted.
What it does not cover
Milk is a grocery food rather than a beverage, which surprises most people. A coffee bought from a cafe is restaurant meals and ready-to-eat food, so the household that spends heavily on takeaway coffee shows very little in this line. Alcohol has its own category.
Those boundaries are set by the survey's own classification, not by us. They matter because a figure read against the wrong definition is worse than no figure: it looks precise and it answers a different question. If you are comparing your own spending against this page, check the exclusions above first.
How to read the figure
The split between this category and cafe coffee is the thing to understand before drawing any conclusion. A low figure here does not mean a household drinks little coffee, only that it does not make much of it at home.
Every survey year
The Household Economic Survey runs every three years. This is non-alcoholic beverages in each survey since 2007, for all New Zealand households.
Read the two money columns together. The published column is the money of each survey year itself, so comparing 2007 with 2023 across it compares two different dollars. The adjusted column restates every year in 2026.06 dollars using the Food CPI series, which is the column to use for a real change. That adjustment is our arithmetic, not a Stats NZ statistic.
The reporting column is the share of surveyed households that recorded any spending in this category at all: the lower it is, the further the average sits from what a household that does spend here actually pays.
| Survey | Published per week | In 2026.06 dollars | Sampling error | Households reporting | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | $8.40 | $14.64 | ±6% | 82.5% | — |
| 2010 | $10.30 | $15.73 | ±5% | 85.1% | +23% |
| 2013 | $11.40 | $16.32 | ±5% | 85.5% | +11% |
| 2016 | $11.70 | $16.46 | ±5% | 81.8% | +3% |
| 2019 | $11.50 | $15.58 | ±7% | 67.1% | -2% |
| 2023 | $15.60 | $16.75 | ±6.8% | 65.6% | +36% |
Non-Alcoholic Drinks over time
Each bar is one survey, restated in 2026.06 dollars so the six are comparable. In real terms, spending on non-alcoholic beverages has moved up 14 per cent since 2007. In the money of the day it went from $8.40 to $15.60 a week, and most of that difference is prices rather than behaviour, which is exactly why the chart is drawn on the adjusted figures.
$0$18.60
The dark line with a cap at each end shows the sampling error Stats NZ publishes with that figure: the survey is confident the true value lies within it. A long line means a less certain number.
By household size
Household size explains more of the variation in most categories than anything else on this page.
$0$31.92
The dark line with a cap at each end shows the sampling error Stats NZ publishes with that figure: the survey is confident the true value lies within it. A long line means a less certain number.
By region
The survey groups the country into five broad regions rather than cities, so Auckland is a region and Hamilton is part of the rest of the North Island.
$0$21.67
The dark line with a cap at each end shows the sampling error Stats NZ publishes with that figure: the survey is confident the true value lies within it. A long line means a less certain number.
By tenure
Whether a household owns or rents correlates with age, income and household composition, so a difference here is not caused by tenure alone.
$0$31.45
Not shown, because the survey sample was too small to report reliably: Renting, no rent.
The dark line with a cap at each end shows the sampling error Stats NZ publishes with that figure: the survey is confident the true value lies within it. A long line means a less certain number.
By household income
Deciles split households into ten equal groups from lowest income to highest. A category that barely changes from decile 1 to decile 10 is close to a necessity.
$0$34.74
The dark line with a cap at each end shows the sampling error Stats NZ publishes with that figure: the survey is confident the true value lies within it. A long line means a less certain number.
The rest of food
These are the other components of the same top-level category. They add up, with this one, to the total on the Food page.
Related calculators
- Budget Calculator
- All household spending categories
- Cost of Living Comparison Calculator
- Grocery Budget Calculator
Where these numbers come from
Every figure on this page is from the Stats NZ Household Economic Survey, retrieved through the Aotearoa Data Explorer, for survey years 2007 to 2023. Inflation adjustments use the Stats NZ Consumers Price Index to the 2026.06 quarter. Stats NZ data is used with attribution; the survey figures are theirs and the adjustments are ours.
Household Economic Survey figures are averages of weekly household expenditure and carry the sampling errors shown. They are averages rather than medians, so they are pulled upward by the highest spenders. Figures are rounded as published.