HomeSituations › Running a household

Running a household

Power, rates, the car, childcare and the emergency fund: the recurring costs that decide whether a budget holds.

41 situations worked through, 35 of them with the sums shown. Each one links to the guide that sets out the rules behind it, and that guide is where any rate or threshold is kept current.

The people in these situations are illustrations written to show how the rules land on somebody, not real customers and not case histories. The arithmetic is real and the rules are real; the names and the circumstances are made up to teach.

Showing every situation on this page.

Nothing on this page matches that. Try a shorter word, or the full list of situations.

Car Finance: Dealer, Bank or Pre-Approval

Aroha - Dealer 12% vs Bank 9%

Aroha is buying a $25,000 car. She has a $5,000 deposit, so she needs to borrow $20,000 over 5 years. The dealer offers finance at 12% a year. Her bank pre-approved her at 9% a year.

  1. Amount borrowed: $20,000 over 60 months at 12% a year
  2. Monthly repayment: about $444.89
  3. Total repaid: $444.89 x 60 = $26,693.40

Total interest: $26,693.40 - $20,000 = $6,693.40

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Tama - The Balloon Payment Trade-Off

Tama is looking at the same $20,000 loan over 5 years at 12%. The dealer offers a version with a $6,000 balloon (residual) payment at the end to lower his monthly cost. He wants to know the real trade-off.

  1. Monthly repayment: about $444.89
  2. Nothing owing at the end

Total interest: $6,693.40

⚠ Cheaper each month, dearer overall

The balloon cuts Tama's monthly payment by about $73, but it lifts his total interest from $6,693.40 to $8,285.20, roughly $1,592 more, and he still has to find $6,000 at the end. If the car is worth less than $6,000 by then, he is out of pocket to refinance or sell.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Mele - Add-Ons Rolled Into the Loan

Mele agrees to the $20,000 car loan at 12% over 5 years. At signing, the dealer adds $1,500 of mechanical breakdown insurance and $1,000 of GAP cover, and rolls the $2,500 into the loan. She wants to see what that really costs.

  1. Loan without add-ons: $20,000, about $444.89 a month, $26,693.40 total
  2. Loan with $2,500 of add-ons: $22,500, about $500.50 a month
  3. Total repaid on the bigger loan: $500.50 x 60 = $30,030.00
  4. Extra paid because of the add-ons: $30,030.00 - $26,693.40 = $3,336.60

Of that, $2,500 is the add-on price and $836.60 is interest on it

💡 The hidden cost of financing extras

Because the $2,500 of add-ons sits inside the loan, Mele pays interest on it for five years. The extras raise her payment by about $55.61 a month and cost $3,336.60 in total. If she did not fully understand or want them, she can ask to cancel and be refunded, and take any mis-selling to the lender's dispute resolution scheme.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Ben - How a Bigger Deposit Cuts the Cost

Ben is buying a $25,000 car with a bank loan at 9% over 5 years. He is deciding between putting down a $2,000 deposit and using his old car as an $8,000 trade-in instead.

  1. Monthly repayment: about $477.45
  2. Total repaid: $477.45 x 60 = $28,647.00

Total interest: $5,647.00

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Car Loan Balloon Payments

Dave - Standard vs 30% Balloon on a $30,000 Car

Dave is buying a $30,000 car over 5 years (60 months) at a fixed 12% a year, which is 1% a month. The dealer offers a 30% balloon, leaving $9,000 to pay at the end.

  1. Monthly repayment: $667.33
  2. Total of payments: $667.33 x 60 = $40,040
  3. Lump sum at the end: $0

Total interest paid: $40,040 - $30,000 = $10,040

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Priya - A GFV Deal and the Negative Equity Risk

Priya takes a $35,000 car over 3 years (36 months) at 10.95% a year, with a balloon set at 43% of the price, which is $15,050.

  1. Standard monthly (no balloon): $1,145.03
  2. Balloon monthly: $790.00

Lower by $355.03 a month, but $15,050 is owed at the end

💡 The guarantee is what protects Priya

Under a guaranteed future value deal, the lender carries the risk that the car is worth less than $15,050, so Priya can walk away. Without that guarantee, the risk is hers. Read the contract to find out which one you have before you rely on handing the car back.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Sam - The Refinancing Trap

Sam took Dave's 30% balloon loan on the $30,000 car. After 5 years he has paid $33,428 in instalments but cannot afford the $9,000 balloon, so he refinances it over another 3 years at 13% a year.

  1. New monthly repayment: $303.25
  2. Total of new payments: $303.25 x 36 = $10,917

Extra interest on the balloon alone: $10,917 - $9,000 = $1,917

⚠ Refinancing turns a short loan into a long one

By refinancing the balloon, Sam turned a 5-year loan into an 8-year one and paid thousands more in interest. If he refinances again at the end, the cost climbs further. The balloon that made the monthly payment look cheap ended up as the most expensive part of the deal.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Aroha - A Smaller Car, the Same Lesson

Aroha buys a $20,000 car over 5 years (60 months) at 11.95% a year. She is offered a 35% balloon, leaving $7,000 to pay at the end.

  1. Monthly repayment: $444.38
  2. Total of payments: $444.38 x 60 = $26,663

Total interest: $26,663 - $20,000 = $6,663

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Car Running Costs NZ

Aroha - A Typical Petrol Car for a Year

Aroha drives a petrol hatchback 12,000 km a year. It uses about 8 L/100km, petrol is around $2.60 a litre, and comprehensive insurance costs her about $1,000. Rego is the current petrol fee.

  1. Fuel: 12,000 km × 8 ÷ 100 = 960 L; × $2.60 = $2,496
  2. Rego (petrol, 12 months): $181
  3. WOF: one check a year, about $60
  4. Insurance (illustrative): $1,000
  5. Servicing and repairs (illustrative): $600
  6. Tyres: a $800 set every 40,000 km, so 12,000 ÷ 40,000 × $800 = $240

Running cost, excluding depreciation: $4,577 a year

💡 Now Add Depreciation

Say the car loses about $2,000 of value in the year. The true all-in cost of running it becomes $4,577 + $2,000 = $6,577 a year, even though only $4,577 of that showed up as bills you paid.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Hemi - A Diesel Ute With Road User Charges

Hemi drives a diesel ute 20,000 km a year. It uses about 7 L/100km, diesel is around $2.10 a litre, and it pays RUC like all light diesels.

  1. RUC: 20,000 km ÷ 1,000 × $76 = $1,520
  2. Diesel: 20,000 km × 7 ÷ 100 = 1,400 L; × $2.10 = $2,940
  3. Rego (diesel, 12 months): $249
  4. WOF: about $60
  5. Insurance (illustrative): $1,200
  6. Servicing and repairs (illustrative): $800
  7. Tyres: a $1,200 set every 40,000 km, so 20,000 ÷ 40,000 × $1,200 = $600

Running cost, excluding depreciation: $7,369 a year

💡 The Same Trip in an EV

An electric vehicle doing the same 20,000 km pays the same $1,520 of RUC and the same higher rego, but swaps diesel for electricity. At roughly 17 kWh/100km and $0.30 per kWh charging at home, energy costs 20,000 × 17 ÷ 100 = 3,400 kWh; × $0.30 = $1,020, against the diesel's $2,940. The energy saving is what offsets the EV's RUC and dearer rego.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Cheap to Buy vs Cheap to Run, Over Five Years

Two cars, both driven 15,000 km a year for five years (75,000 km total), petrol at $2.60 a litre. Car A costs $6,000 but uses 11 L/100km. Car B costs $18,000 but uses just 5 L/100km.

  1. Car A fuel over 5 years
  2. 75,000 km × 11 ÷ 100 = 8,250 L; × $2.60 = $21,450
  3. Car B fuel over 5 years
  4. 75,000 km × 5 ÷ 100 = 3,750 L; × $2.60 = $9,750
  5. Fuel saving with Car B
  6. $21,450 − $9,750 = $11,700
  7. Extra you paid for Car B

$18,000 − $6,000 = $12,000, almost exactly cancelled by the $11,700 fuel saving

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Aroha's Cost Per Kilometre

Using Aroha's petrol car from Example 1, we work out what each kilometre really costs, which is the fairest way to judge whether a drive is worth it.

  1. Running cost only
  2. $4,577 ÷ 12,000 km = $0.381 per km, about 38 cents
  3. Including depreciation
  4. ($4,577 + $2,000) ÷ 12,000 km = $6,577 ÷ 12,000

= $0.548 per km, about 55 cents

⚠️ Fixed Costs Make Low-Mileage Cars Expensive Per Kilometre

Because rego, insurance, WOF and depreciation land whether you drive or not, they are spread over fewer kilometres if you barely use the car, which pushes the cost per kilometre up. If your annual mileage is very low, it is worth checking whether owning a car beats car-share, taxis or public transport for your situation. Inland Revenue also publishes a kilometre rate for work-related driving, which is a handy sense-check on your own cost per kilometre.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Emergency Fund Guide

Job Loss Survival Story

Sarah, 34, lost her marketing job during company restructuring.

  1. Emergency fund balance: $18,000
  2. Monthly essential expenses: $3,200
  3. Coverage: 5.6 months
  4. Severance pay: 2 months salary ($10,000)
  5. Total runway: 8.7 months

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Multiple Emergencies Hit at Once

The Johnson family faced a triple emergency in one month.

  1. Emergency fund balance: $22,000
  2. Monthly expenses: $4,100
  3. Coverage: 5.4 months

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Self-Employed Income Drop

Mike is a self-employed consultant. A major client suddenly cancelled their contract.

  1. Normal monthly income: $8,000
  2. Lost client revenue: $4,000/month (50% of income)
  3. New income: $4,000/month
  4. Essential expenses: $4,500/month
  5. Monthly shortfall: $500
  6. Emergency fund: $45,000 (10 months at full expenses)
💡 Self-Employment Reality

Mike's 10-month emergency fund (larger than typical 6 months) was essential for his self-employment. Income fluctuations are normal when you're self-employed. His large cushion gave him time to replace lost revenue without panic or desperate decision-making.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Building from Zero

Emma, 26, had no emergency fund and was living paycheque to paycheque.

  1. Emergency fund: $0
  2. Monthly income: $3,800
  3. Monthly expenses: $3,750
  4. Monthly surplus: $50 (barely surviving)
  5. Credit card debt: $2,500

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Money After a Natural Disaster

Aroha - Earthquake repair within the cap (Christchurch)

An earthquake cracks the foundation and internal linings of Aroha's home. The assessed cost to repair the building is $85,000. Aroha has private house insurance with fire cover, so she has natural hazards cover automatically.

  1. Building cap: $300,000 plus GST = $345,000 including GST
  2. Repair cost: $85,000
  3. Is the repair under the cap? $85,000 is well under $345,000, so yes

The natural hazards layer covers the repair, less Aroha's policy excess

💡 Why the claim still goes to her insurer

Even though the Commission ultimately pays this claim, Aroha never contacts the Commission. Her insurer is the single point of contact and settles the claim for her.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

The Patel family - Full rebuild above the cap (Hawke's Bay)

An earthquake makes the Patels' home unsafe and it must be fully rebuilt. The rebuild is quoted at $520,000. Their private house policy is sum insured at $600,000, which is enough to cover a rebuild at today's costs.

  1. Total rebuild cost: $520,000
  2. Natural hazards layer pays up to the cap: $345,000 including GST
  3. Amount above the cap: $520,000 - $345,000 = $175,000
  4. Private insurer pays the amount above the cap: $175,000 (within the $600,000 sum insured)

Total covered: $345,000 + $175,000 = $520,000, the full rebuild

⚠️ What if the sum insured was too low

If the Patels had insured for only $300,000, the maths breaks. The Commission still pays $345,000, but a policy sum insured of $300,000 is less than the rebuild, so above the cap there is nothing left to draw on for the extra cost. They would have to fund the shortfall themselves. Setting the sum insured to the real rebuild cost is what prevents this.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Jess - A renter's contents claim (Wellington)

Jess rents a flat that floods in a storm. The building is her landlord's concern, but her own belongings, a sofa, bed, whiteware, clothes and a laptop, are ruined. The damage to her contents is assessed at $18,000. Jess holds a contents policy with a sum insured of $25,000 and a $400 excess.

  1. Natural hazards cover for contents: none, the Commission does not cover contents
  2. Jess claims on her own contents policy
  3. Contents damage: $18,000, within her $25,000 sum insured
  4. Less her excess: $18,000 - $400 = $17,600

Her contents insurer pays $17,600

⚠️ No contents cover means no payout for belongings

If Jess had no contents insurance, she would receive nothing from the natural hazards scheme for her ruined belongings, because the Commission covers only the building and land, neither of which she owns. She could still apply for Civil Defence help toward emergency essentials, but that is nowhere near the value of replacing everything. This is exactly why renters need their own contents cover.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

The Williams family - Civil Defence support after a storm

A severe storm floods the Williams family's home and a civil defence emergency is declared. They evacuate for several days, cannot work for a week, and need to replace ruined food and bedding while they are out of the house.

  1. Emergency accommodation: 4 nights at $160 = $640
  2. Replacement food and bedding: $350
  3. Immediate out-of-pocket so far: $640 + $350 = $990
  4. Plus lost wages for the week they cannot work

Work and Income assesses a Civil Defence Payment toward these costs

💡 Two tracks running at once

Notice the family runs two tracks: Civil Defence support for the immediate crisis, and an insurance claim for the longer rebuild. Treat them as separate processes so a slow insurance settlement does not leave you without cash in the first weeks.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Power, Broadband and Mobile Bills Decoded NZ

The Hohepa Family, Palmerston North

4-person household, hadn't switched providers in 8 years.

  1. Power switched to lower retailer: -$55/month
  2. Broadband switched to new 12-month fibre: -$25/month
  3. Mobile consolidated to family plan: -$35/month
  4. New monthly total: $450/month = $5,400/year
  5. Annual savings: $1,380

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Sarah's Broadband Bill Shock

12-month fibre contract at promotional $69/month.

  1. Phoned retention team
  2. Asked "I'm going to switch - can you match the deal I signed up at?"
  3. Retention offered new 12-month deal at $72/month
  4. Saved $17/month = $204/year going forward
  5. 5-minute phone call

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Dan's Analysis

Offered Power + Broadband bundle at "10% discount".

  1. Bundle: $3,900/year
  2. Separate: $3,360/year
  3. Bundle costs $540 MORE per year
  4. The "10% discount" is off an inflated base rate

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Maya's Trip to Australia

Went to Melbourne for 5 days without checking mobile settings.

  1. Base plan: $45
  2. Roaming days: 5 × $10 = $50
  3. Data overages: about $280 of 140MB over
  4. Total bill: $375 vs normal $45
  5. Unexpected extra: $330 for 5 days of normal phone use

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Understanding Money NZ

Harper, 10, Auckland

Opened her first savings account at age 5.

  1. Birthday + Christmas deposits: $50
  2. Harper's own deposits: about $12
  3. Interest earned: about $5
  4. Total balance: about $67

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Year 9 Class, Wellington School

A week-long tracking of card-only spending.

  1. Students estimated they'd spend: $25/week
  2. Actual tracked spending: $42/week
  3. Invisible gap: $17/week (over $880/year)

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Mason, 16, Palmerston North

Earned $1,200 over summer, locked $1,000 into a 2-year term deposit at 4.5%.

  1. Term deposit interest over 2 years: about $90
  2. On-call savings would have earned: about $60
  3. Extra $30 won by locking it away

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Cyclone Gabrielle, Hawke's Bay, February 2023

Families with $50 to $200 cash at home managed basic needs. Those without struggled. Since then, Civil Defence recommends NZ households keep a small cash reserve as part of emergency preparedness.

This one turns on the rules rather than on a calculation, so there are no sums to show.

Warmer Kiwi Homes Grants

Aroha - Community Services Card holder, insulation and a heat pump

Aroha owns and lives in a 1970s home in Rotorua and holds a Community Services Card. Her home has no ceiling or underfloor insulation and no fixed heater. She qualifies for the top 90% rate on both insulation and heating.

  1. Ceiling and underfloor insulation quote: $4,300
  2. Grant at 90%: $4,300 × 0.90 = $3,870

Aroha pays: $4,300 - $3,870 = $430

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

The Nguyen household - eligible by area, insulation only

The Nguyens own and live in an older home in a middle-income area of Hamilton. They do not hold a Community Services Card or SuperGold Combo card, but their home sits in a qualifying area on the programme map. Because it is a middle-income area, they qualify for insulation at the 50% rate but not for the heat pump grant.

  1. Ceiling and underfloor insulation quote: $4,300
  2. Grant at 50%: $4,300 × 0.50 = $2,150

The Nguyens pay: $4,300 - $2,150 = $2,150

💡 Same programme, different rate

The Nguyens still get real help with insulation, but at half the cost rather than 90%, and no heat pump grant, because their area is assessed as middle-income. Eligibility and rate depend on where the home sits on the map, not just on owning the home.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Sione - a landlord, not eligible but must meet Healthy Homes

Sione owns a rental in Porirua that he does not live in. He hoped to use a Warmer Kiwi Homes grant to upgrade it. Because it is a rental, he is not eligible for the grant at all. He still has legal duties under the Healthy Homes standards and pays for them himself.

  1. Grant for a rental property: not available

Sione receives $0 in grants

⚠️ Rentals had to comply by 1 July 2025

All private rentals have had to meet the Healthy Homes standards since 1 July 2025, with ceiling and underfloor insulation compulsory since 1 July 2019. Sione cannot use Warmer Kiwi Homes for the work, and he cannot pass the cost to his tenant. This is why the grant and the standards are two separate systems.

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

The Rangi household - co-payment on a larger home

The Rangis own and live in a larger 1990s home in Whangarei and hold a SuperGold Combo card, so they qualify for the 90% rate on both insulation and heating. This example works through their co-payment in full.

  1. Larger ceiling and underfloor job: $4,600
  2. Grant at 90%: $4,600 × 0.90 = $4,140

Co-payment: $4,600 - $4,140 = $460

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Childcare Costs and Subsidies NZ

Tina and Mark, Hamilton

Two children, combined income $95,000. Never applied for Working for Families because they "thought they earned too much."

This one turns on the rules rather than on a calculation, so there are no sums to show.

Jason and Mei, Auckland

Hired a nanny at $25/hour cash. 40 hours/week. Didn't register as an employer.

This one turns on the rules rather than on a calculation, so there are no sums to show.

Anna, 34, Christchurch

Considering returning to work at $65,000. One child aged 2 in daycare at $300/week.

  1. Net salary: ~$1,000/week
  2. Childcare cost after partial subsidy: $220/week
  3. WFF (In-Work Tax Credit gained): $72/week
  4. Net financial benefit of working: $1,000 - $220 + $72 = $852/week
  5. PLUS: KiwiSaver employer contribution ($37/week), career progression, social benefits

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

How Are Council Rates Calculated in NZ

Gary, 55, Rotorua

Missed 2 quarterly rates payments due to financial stress. Rates bill: $4,200/year.

This one turns on the rules rather than on a calculation, so there are no sums to show.

Helen, 48, Wellington

Property revalued at $1,100,000 (up from $780,000). Helen believed the new CV was too high.

This one turns on the rules rather than on a calculation, so there are no sums to show.

Mere, 72, Whangarei

Living on NZ Super ($27,000/year). Owned her home outright. Never applied for the rates rebate.

This one turns on the rules rather than on a calculation, so there are no sums to show.

Inflation & Purchasing Power Guide

Wage Earner - Annual Pay Increases

Sarah, marketing manager in Wellington

  1. 2025 salary: $89,631 (28% nominal increase)
  2. Looks great on paper!
  3. But real purchasing power: $66,073 in 2015 dollars
  4. Actual decrease: -5.6% from 2015
  5. Lost ~$4,000/year in buying power despite raises

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Retiree - Fixed Income Erosion

John & Helen, retired couple in Christchurch

  1. Combined NZ Super: $31,200/year ($2,600/month)
  2. Savings: $300,000 in term deposits
  3. Interest (4%): $12,000/year ($1,000/month)
  4. Total income: $43,200/year ($3,600/month)
  5. Expenses: $3,200/month
  6. Surplus: $400/month

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Family - Saving for Future Purchase

Mike & Lisa, saving for house deposit in Auckland

  1. Target house: $800,000
  2. Deposit needed: $160,000 (20%)
  3. Current savings: $50,000
  4. Need to save: $110,000
  5. Plan: Save $2,000/month for 55 months (~4.5 years)
  6. Target date: Mid-2024

The same calculation on its own, with others like it

Situations are taken from the guides listed above and are worked examples for education, not advice. Figures used in an example were current when the guide was written; the guide holds the maintained figure. Last reviewed 2026-09-07. See also the arithmetic on its own, every question the site answers and the guides.