Reviewed 5 August 2026.
A capped percentage fee is two different pricing models wearing one label. Below the cap it behaves exactly like the percentage it advertises, and the amount you pay rises in step with what you earn. At the cap it becomes a flat annual fee, and from that point the percentage stops describing anything you actually pay. The number that separates the two is the cap divided by the rate, and it is almost never printed next to the headline. That omission matters in both directions. A high earner looking at 1 percent sees a fee that sounds ruinous on $300,000 and is in fact half a percent, because the cap has been doing the work for the whole second half of their income. A lower earner sees the same cap advertised as generous protection and will never reach it. This calculator finds your crossover, reports the effective rate you are really paying, and shows how it moves across an income range so you can see which side of the model you are on.
The same fee structure at different incomes. The crossover row is where the two pricing models meet, and your own income is highlighted.
| Annual income | Fee before GST | Fee incl GST | Effective rate | Capped? |
|---|
Everything about a capped fee follows from one division. Cap divided by rate gives the income at which the two halves of the model meet, and knowing it tells you immediately which one applies to you. Below it you are buying a percentage, and the fee grows exactly as fast as your income does, which is the feature people usually want from percentage pricing: a bad year costs less. At or above it you are buying a flat annual fee that happens to be advertised as a percentage, and your growth is free. The uncomfortable case is sitting just below the crossover, because you are paying the maximum rate the structure ever charges with none of the protection the cap offers, and a modest increase in income would cost you nothing extra at all.
Once a cap exists, the advertised percentage becomes a ceiling rather than a price. Nobody above the crossover pays it, and the further above it they are, the further the real rate falls. Doubling your income from the crossover halves your effective rate. Tripling it takes the rate to a third. This is worth stating plainly because the marketing of percentage fees tends to emphasise the percentage to people below the crossover, who genuinely pay it, and emphasise the cap to people above, who genuinely benefit from it, without either group being shown the whole curve. The table above is the whole curve.
A fee of 1% is capped at $1,500.00 a year, quoted plus GST. The crossover is $1,500.00 divided by 0.01, which is $150,000.00 of income. A contractor earning $200,000 would have been charged $2,000.00 without the cap, so the cap saves them $500.00. They pay $1,500.00 before GST and $1,725.00 including it, which is an effective rate of 0.75% excluding GST and 0.86% including it.
The same structure charged to someone earning $100,000 gives no cap at all: they pay $1,000.00, a full 1.00%, and the cap is a feature they are paying for without using. At $500,000 the fee is still $1,500.00, an effective rate of 0.30%. Three people, one fee schedule, and effective rates that differ by more than three times.
The uncapped fee is your income multiplied by the headline rate. The fee charged is the lower of that and the cap, unless the cap is entered as zero, in which case the fee is treated as uncapped. GST is added at 15 percent where the fee is quoted exclusive of it. The effective rate is the fee divided by your income, reported both excluding and including GST because quoted rates are not consistent about which they mean. The crossover income is the cap divided by the rate. Income earning no further fee is the amount by which you exceed the crossover, which is the portion of your income the fee no longer applies to.